EMSVPS的xen超售,与NBVPS的openvz有的一拼啊!看这垃圾硬盘.

lazyzhu

root@MyHost:~#
dd if=/dev/zero of=test.bin bs=64k count=4k conv=fdatasync && rm -rf test.bin
dd if=/dev/zero of=test.bin bs=64k count=4k conv=fdatasync && rm -rf test.bin
dd if=/dev/zero of=test.bin bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync && rm -rf test.bin
dd if=/dev/zero of=test.bin bs=64k count=4k conv=fdatasync && rm -rf test.bin
dd if=/dev/zero of=test.bin bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync && rm -rf test.bin
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 37.0132 s, 7.3 MB/s
root@MyHost:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test.bin bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync && rm -rf test.bin
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 79.1733 s, 3.4 MB/s
root@MyHost:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test.bin bs=64k count=4k conv=fdatasync && rm -rf test.bin
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 28.7494 s, 9.3 MB/s
root@MyHost:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test.bin bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync && rm -rf test.bin
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 69.4151 s, 3.9 MB/s
root@MyHost:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test.bin bs=64k count=4k conv=fdatasync && rm -rf  test.bin
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 21.2879 s, 12.6 MB/s
root@MyHost:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test.bin bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync && rm -rf test.bin
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 63.2027 s, 4.2 MB/s

hotsnow

这年头，超售就是吃饭喝水一样，是本能啊

一手好湿

xen据说不能超瘦吗不是？

hotsnow

原帖由 一手好湿 于 2011-11-4 00:10 发表
xen据说不能超瘦吗不是？

至于你信不信，反正我不信

zjsz007

内存不容易超..其余.........

大胡子

不超人家赚神马？

lazyzhu

原帖由 geyunbing 于 2011-11-4 00:11 发表
   比NBVPS 强点

xen和openvz
价格比较

NB 完胜啊

winder

速度还不错....
不过为啥你们都喜欢dd硬盘呢

lazyzhu

这是医生的35元的:

[root@MyHost35 ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test.bin bs=64k count=4k conv=fdatasync && rm -rf test.bin
dd if=/dev/zero of=test.bin bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync && rm -rf test.bin
dd if=/dev/zero of=test.bin bs=64k count=4k conv=fdatasync && rm -rf test.bin
dd if=/dev/zero of=test.bin bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync && rm -rf test.bin
dd if=/dev/zero of=test.bin bs=64k count=4k conv=fdatasync && rm -rf test.bin
dd if=/dev/zero of=test.bin bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync && rm -rf test.bin
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.32529 seconds, 80.7 MB/s
[root@MyHost35 ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test.bin bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync && rm -rf test.bin
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 6.75403 seconds, 39.7 MB/s
[root@MyHost35 ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test.bin bs=64k count=4k conv=fdatasync && rm -rf test.bin
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 4.01168 seconds, 66.9 MB/s
[root@MyHost35 ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test.bin bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync && rm -rf test.bin
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 6.80427 seconds, 39.5 MB/s
[root@MyHost35 ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test.bin bs=64k count=4k conv=fdatasync && rm -rf test.bin
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.82429 seconds, 70.2 MB/s
[root@MyHost35 ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test.bin bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync && rm -rf test.bin
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 6.46441 seconds, 41.5 MB/s